StatOSS compared
Side by side with the products people usually consider, with the facts read from their own sites and a section on when they are the better pick.
- StatOSS compared with UptimeRobot
- Free tiers, check intervals, what each status page shows, and moving over.
- StatOSS compared with Better Stack
- Three plans and an MIT core, or an on-call and observability suite priced by add-on and seat.
- StatOSS compared with Atlassian Statuspage
- A page with the checks built in, or an incident page fed by integrations and priced per page.
- StatOSS compared with Instatus
- Two status pages with the checks built in: free tiers, check locations, what the page shows, subscribers.
- StatOSS compared with Uptime Kuma
- Two open source monitors: one you host, one that is hosted for you.
- StatOSS compared with Pingdom
- A hundred probe locations and browser checks with no free plan, or a status page with a free plan and an open source core.
- StatOSS compared with Hyperping
- Monitoring, status pages and on-call from $290 a year, or a status page with the checks built in from free.
- StatOSS compared with openstatus
- Two open source status pages with a hosted service: AGPL-3.0 from $30 a month, or MIT from free.
- StatOSS compared with Checkly
- Browser checks and monitoring as code with a separate status page plan, or uptime checks and the page in one.
- StatOSS compared with Cronitor
- $2 a monitor plus $5 a user, or a price per plan with heartbeats and a status page included.
- StatOSS compared with Gatus
- A Go binary configured in YAML with forty alert providers, or a status page with an MIT core, hosted from free.
- Hosted Uptime Kuma, and StatOSS hosted
- Uptime Kuma on a VPS or on PikaPods from $3.30 a month, or StatOSS hosted from free.
- StatOSS compared with StatusCake
- Monitoring from free with status pages on a separate plan, or a status page with the checks built in from free.